Abstract
Even though eight years have passed since the issuance of the South China Sea arbitral award between the Republic of the Philippines and the People’s Republic of China, China has repeatedly claimed that the South China Sea arbitral award is null and void. Thus a question arises with regard to the legal consequences of the award in international law and international relations. The aim of this article is to consider this question by analyzing the impacts of the South China Sea arbitral award from three viewpoints: The impacts on the jurisdiction of an adjudicative body with regard to mixed disputes (adjudicative implications), the protection of the marine environment (environmental implications), and the perception of third States in a spatial order in the South China Sea (spatial implications). This article will argue that the legal consequences of a judicial decision cannot be completely erased by a denial of its validity by one of the disputing parties and that the assessment of a judicial decision can be regarded as a dynamic process that requires constant verification in light of the interaction between the judicial decision, subsequent jurisprudence, and State practice.
html
Included in
Accessibility Request
Some items in this repository were created or digitized prior to implementation of the accessibility standards under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and are preserved in their original, unmodified state for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the College provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request a version of a file or resource, please submit an Accessible File Request Form.
