Authors

Files

Download

Download Full Text (422 KB)

Description

This article analyzes the use of force, differentiating between military force (prohibited in principle, allowed in exceptions like self-defense) and law enforcement force (allowed in principle, but strictly regulated). It asserts that actions of a military character, even if disguised as law enforcement (such as in the Diaoyu Islands dispute or against foreign military vessels), should be categorized as military activities to ensure strict regulation of the use of force. Procedures must follow graduated steps: query, warning, warning shots, and actual use of force. Limitations on force must adhere to the principles of necessity, proportionality, and distinction.

Publisher

China Maritime Studies Institute, U.S Naval War College

City

Newport, Rhode Island

Keywords

Use of Force, Military Activities, Law Enforcement Force, Proportionality, Self-Defense.

CMSI Archive Translation: Legal Problems Regarding the Use of Force in Military Actions at Sea

Share

COinS
 

Accessibility Request

Some items in this repository were created or digitized prior to implementation of the accessibility standards under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and are preserved in their original, unmodified state for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the College provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request a version of a file or resource, please submit an Accessible File Request Form.